top story- ECO PORN AID PROJECT RAISES 100K
Couple sticks it to the man by sticking it in various orifices.
Porno- it's busty blondes and abs of steel 12 inch membered men reinforce gender stereotypes that could cause insecurities in many and probably detract from healthy sexuality. Porn is just no good. Or is it?
That's what I find myself asking after reading several articles about Leona Johansson and Tommy Hol Ellingson and their website f***kforforest.com, which Yoko Ono has called the greatest art project to ever come out of Norway.
The premise is simple. They make porno, and every penny goes to protecting endangered forest. After educating the crowd about the dangers of overdevelopment on stage at a music festival, they staged a public sex show, giving them substantial legal troubles and enough press to earn over 100,000 dollars in their first year of the organization's sexistence. Let's face it- porn is a big industry and it makes a lot of money.
And yes, I went to the website. Which is illegal if you're not 18. I wouldn't say any of these people are porn stereotypes. A lot of dreadlocks, normal (but beautiful) wangs, and (heaven forbid) average sized natural breasts. They also seem to be promoting idealism as part of there sex appeal. Although I still have a lot of questions about the merits of porno, it would be interesting to see more porn in which the stars were not just sexy based on their bodies, but also their ideas.
read more about that here:http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/g/a/2005/04/13/gree.DTL&type=printable
No comments:
Post a Comment